Case · part two
In July we asked two AI assistants who could remake a broken boat part near Cascais. Neither named this studio. Both could describe it in detail the moment we used its name. Five weeks later that gap closed for one assistant and stayed shut for the others. Here is what moved, what did not, and what the same test would probably find on your own site.
One of the questions we wrote down in July was "Is there a workshop in Cascais that 3D prints marine parts?" Nobody at the studio chose that phrasing. It is how a boat owner asks. This is the answer that comes back today.
Notice what the assistant is doing there. It is not offering a link and inviting the reader to go and find out. It is answering on the studio's behalf, in the studio's own words, down to the lead time and the price floor. That is the part worth sitting with if you run a business of your own: whatever your site says today is what a stranger is being told, and if a number on your page is three years out of date, it is three years out of date in the answer too. The customer never sees where the error came from.
The list was written on 11 July, before any work started. Every question runs three times per assistant, and every answer is kept word for word. Freezing the questions first is what makes the comparison mean anything, and it is the first thing worth asking anyone who shows you an AI visibility result: when did you write the questions down?
named the studio did not name it
The bottom row is the control, and it carries the whole point of this page. Every assistant, in July and again in August, describes the business accurately the moment the question contains its name. That is also the test almost everyone runs on themselves, and it tells you close to nothing. The rows above it are the ones a real customer generates, because customers do not type the name of a company they have never heard of. Recognition and recommendation are two different measurements, and only one of them is worth money.
Every question is tagged by how far along the buyer is: describing a symptom, asking how the job gets done, or asking who does it locally. The studio owns the last of those three and almost none of the first two.
That shape is not unusual, and it is worth checking against your own site. A business that describes its service clearly gets picked up at the provider stage, because that is the question its pages were written to answer. Almost nobody writes the page explaining which plastic survives sun and salt water, so almost nobody gets named on it. On 12 of the 30 questions here a competitor was named and the studio was not, and every one of those sat earlier in the journey than the point where its pages start. The site answers who does this. Answering what do I even need is the next piece of work, and it is now measured rather than guessed at.
The short version
Perplexity searches the live web with its own crawler. ChatGPT leans on Bing's index, Gemini on Google's.
Bing could not reach this site for two months, for the reason set out in part one. An assistant reading Bing's index was reading a copy of the web where these pages did not exist.
Bing is back, and now puts the studio first for the same question in a search box. ChatGPT reads that index, so it should start naming the studio next. That is a prediction with a date on it, and the next re-measure settles it.
The transferable version, for anyone who does not own a 3D printing studio in Cascais: your standing inside an AI assistant sits downstream of a crawler you have no control over, and the two can be months apart. A site can be in good shape and still be missing from an assistant, purely because the index that assistant reads has not called round since spring. Nothing in your analytics will show you this. Visits that never happened do not appear as a decline.
| Check | Where it stands | Status |
|---|---|---|
| An assistant names the studio when a customer describes the job | 0 of 3 in July, 8 of 8 in August, all of them Perplexity | Resolved |
| An assistant quotes the studio's own site as a source | 0 of 30 answers in July, 87 of 90 in August | Resolved |
| What the assistant says about the studio is true | Every published fact reproduced correctly in the answer we checked | Resolved |
| Bing reaching and listing the pages | All four known addresses now returned, including two it had never loaded | Resolved |
| ChatGPT and Gemini on non-branded questions | 0 of 25, unchanged since July | Open |
| Questions earlier in the buying journey | 2 of 8 and 0 of 9. A content gap, now located | Open |
| Visits from search | Three clicks since the site started being measured in July | Open |
Three clicks came from search over the same period, so this is a visibility result and not yet a traffic one. One assistant answers and two do not, which is why there is no single blended score anywhere on this page: any tool offering you one number for "AI visibility" is averaging across assistants that disagree with each other this sharply. And an assistant's answer is a dated snapshot rather than a ranking, which is why every figure here carries the day it was read.
take-two.co · question set frozen 2026-07-11 · re-measured 2026-08-17: 30 questions × 3 assistants × 3 repetitions = 270 stored answers
Bing and Google read 2026-09-01 · Sources: the stored answer set, Google Search Console, Bing.
A First Look takes about twenty minutes, live on a call with the screen shared. No logins required, and there is no pitch deck.
Get a Free First Look →